Calendar Wednesday, February 08, 2012
Text Size
   
O'Shansky on Film
Saw VI PDF  | Print |  E-mail
Written by Joe O'Shansky   
Sunday, 31 October 2010 08:53

   alt

    Let's set the stage.

    October 2004 and I take a girl I met at Vintage Stock to see Saw. I already hate the film because I have to tell people I'm going to see Saw or that I saw Saw. It's an unwieldy bullshit set of words. How are you supposed to say them and not sound like an asshole? "I'm going to witness Saw." It's not a stigmata, though the point of the series seems to have evolved into involuntary self-flagellation.

    So I'm driving a shitty Nissan and we see the movie. She liked it and I didn't. It was sort of a Se7en rip off, but it was the lack of really well designed kills (aside from the ceiling shotguns) and the laugh worthy sight of a puppet on a tricycle delivering Jigsaw's now iconic line, "I'd like to play a game", that had me wondering how long it would take to be over. We probably should have gotten drunk first (hindsight remains 20/20). We briefly debated Saw's relative merits and I took her back to the Vintage Stock parking lot. When we talked again she was telling me about her long distance boyfriend in West Virginia.

   I haven't seen a Saw film since.

alt

   Apparently a lot happened. At least four films worth of stuff. And so, because I have to see the seventh film, Saw 3D, I decided to watch the sixth, my first in as many years. And then I had to hit Wikipedia.

   Jigsaw (Tobin Bell) has been dead of his cancer for the last three flicks but gained followers that came to support his conceited cause. The first was Shawnee Smith's character, Amanda, which escaped me because I never saw Saw II. Thanks to Wikipedia I know that Saw III takes place in the same time frame and it all ties together with Saw IV. Between those Roman numerals we get Costas Fucking Mandylor, without a doubt the poor man's Don Johnson, a detective investigating the crimes of Jigsaw and who has also become a part of Jigsaw's game in order to save his daughter (who dies anyway and fuck you if you care).

  Others live and die as well, including Marky Mark's brother, then come back again which is weird because watching Saw VI was like when I stopped watching Lost for two seasons and started again. All kinds of shit happened yet the same situations were still ongoing.

  So anyway, Saw VI opens with a typical game scene between two people that were really just douchebags to begin with because they were screwing someone out of something. I guess at some point Jigsaw's murderous puzzles became acts of psychological philanthropy. The idea today is "a pound of flesh" and the trapped Red Shirt able to cut off enough pieces of themselves and deposit the chunks on a scale in a minute gets to live, and presumably re-think their approach to life.

  The survivor is interviewed by The Worst Fucking Actor on Earth Named Costas Mandylor and Not Christopher Lambert (Det. Hoffman) who is actually behind the gruesome lessons. It's a prelude to the main plot involving the insurance company that denied Jigsaw's dead ass coverage. I shit you not, Saw VI is topical.

alt

   So we follow the trails of William Easton (Peter Outerbridge; whose last name sounds like a series of fantasy novels), a mid-level policy killer working for a greedy insurance company. He, with his team of opportunistic assholes, work night and day to deny coverage to people that will die without the help they thought they paid for. Easton is kidnapped and taken to Jigsaw's bizarre, posthumous, house of traps where he's made to navigate a series of tests that end in other people dying if he's lucky. It's all in order to see his family again, who have also been kidnapped and are held in cells with fire sprinklers ready to spew flesh melting acid on them if Easton doesn't navigate his tests in time.

   The Saw franchise was already tired, and what was amazing about Saw VI, despite its breviity, was how it was tiring even though I skipped four movies. How these haven't become a SyFy Channel series yet I'll never know since Saw VI possesses all the traits of a cheaply made, straight-to-DVD name grab. These films have always been based on low overhead but even the first one had a cinematic sense and I'm told Saw II was actually kind of good. But the same could be said of the first couple of Hellraiser flicks. They spawned into nine films, mostly on video. Saw VI feels that cheap and tossed off while constantly tying its events back to its own overly self-important mythology.

   Pretty much everyone in the film is a dick so there's no one to root for and all you're left with are the death games which, despite my missing most of the series, feel underwhelming compared to the highlights I've seen from the previous films. No pits of hypodermic needles or vats of guts. Instead the gags are almost all mechanically based and telegraphed from a mile off (during the Merry-Go-Round my assurance that two women would live was born out). They feel like video game levels and, as something meant to top itself, Saw VI doesn't seem to up the ante on its predecessors.

  The acting is B-rate, even before the Mandylor Factor, and the direction by first timer Kevin Greutert is workman-like at best though he seems to make the most of his budget. He's also at the helm of Saw 3D so I guess I'll have the opportunity to see if he gets any better. But outside of the extra dimension making Saw suck for a higher ticket price, and unless Jigsaw has some beyond-the-grave plans to kill Jewish newborns crying for their mothers while they crawl through a mini-Auschwitz then I can say I have no confidence in this, the shittiest long-running horror series since The Doodlebops.

  It's still not as bad as Twilight.

alt  

  

             4 0f 10   

 

   

Last Updated on Thursday, 04 November 2010 09:15
 
How Do I Delete You? PDF  | Print |  E-mail
Written by Joe O'Shansky   
Wednesday, 06 October 2010 07:04

 alt

                           Hello.

 It's been a while. My name is Joe. O-name wa? Never mind. I just wanted to let you know that as soon as I figure out how to erase the movie news articles and sort my archived reviews, there will be...more reviews.

 There are actually quite a few films I would have loved to write about during the course of my year at UTW. I never wrote about Inception, easily the best film of the shittiest and hottest summer since Nagasaki. Never wrote about The Slammin' Salmon; one of the funniest comedies of the year (The Other Guys and MacGuber being the others). I'd love to try and describe the unfuckingbelieveable fight choreography in Undisputed III or relate the fetishistic joys of the best vampire flick I've seen this year, Thirst. I did write about The Human Centipede, see that here. But I'm OCD. I need to clean the shit out of the nest. 

  And I decided movie news was useless. Not just for JE, but in the grander sense. I actually feel bad for web guys that chase the trades and prowl 70 different quasi-movie related websites a day just to post a couple of hundred words around some cut and pasted conjecture about how maybe the chick from Caprica might get cast as Wonder Woman. If I'm going to spend time writing here it won't be about upcoming pictures, phantom casting based on Emma Stone's Tweets, or posting trailers. I'm not much of a blogger, and that shit can be posted on The Boards.

  In fact, your rarefied tastes are usually far ahead of mine to begin with. I like writing here. I'll be trying to do it more often, and well.

  

  

 

 

  

 
Avatar Probably Needs Your Money PDF  | Print |  E-mail
Written by Joe O'Shansky   
Saturday, 05 September 2009 11:01

alt

Head on over to Apple Trailers to get a hi-def look at the kinda new teaser for the really new James Cameron flick Avatar. Click here, and I'll explain after.

I'm not a Cameron nerd. I'm not even over the moon about this trailer. But a little context is in order. The last non-documentary film James Cameron made was Titanic, still the highest grossing film in history. You can lay that on the legions of tween girls who sat through that film dozens of times in a theater. And despite it's three-hour running time, they couldn't get enough of Leo and Kate. Cameron was seriously gambling at the time. With an estimated 200 million dollar budget, and a December release date, for a movie where literally everyone knows the end, it turned out to be a gamble that paid off in billions.

Twelve years later Cameron is taking another significant gamble, and this time I'm not sure how it can succeed on that level. Don't get me wrong. I have some faith that Avatar will be a good film. Cameron has proven nothing more clearly than his ability as an incredibly ambitious and singularly adept director of action films, who still manages to keep you locked into a good story. True Lies is his weakest, and his most Michael Bay-ish film. But while Micheal Bay made Transformers 2 the biggest grossing film of this summer, that 200 million dollar (apparently shitty) film is about to be double-downed by Cameron and Avatar's reportedly 300 million dollar budget. That's not including the minimum 50 million in advertising.

If it seems like I'm emphasizing the budgets over the films, it's because these kinds of numbers can end careers if the flick doesn't play huge, and I'm interested in how the numbers play out. The idea of Avatar has been bubbling around for way over a decade. Cameron has been hyping the new mo-cap technologies for a few years now, and how he was going to use it, in combination with new 3-D technologies, to create the ultimate photo-realistic aliens, and alien environments, ever shined on a screen. And while I have no doubt Cameron, much like George Lucas (who ridiculed Cameron for Titanic's budget, and then made a shitty 125 million dollar Star Wars flick two years later), has pushed forward the horizon of special effects technology by miles, his lackadaisical path in getting Avatar to the screen has already made it less impressive than originally advertised. Just look at the trailer. Granted, the IMAX version of it might kill, but in 2-D, and even HD, this is not groundbreaking work. Cameron has already tried to walk back the hype himself. It still looks cool, though nothing makes me wonder how it was done. And what is slightly more troubling is that the design of the Na'vi and other alien creatures are, for lack of better words, goofy and slightly derivative. The Phantom Menace ominously comes to mind.

But that doesn't mean you're not in for something absolutely badass on December 18th. I have faith in much of the actual talent involved and despite what has been, so far, a bungled ad campaign for the film, I don't think it'll be Lucas' Revenge, even if his arch-enemy, 20th Cenutry Fox, is behind the production. Though that would be ironic. If nothing else I have personally never seen a full-on IMAX 3-D flick and in this regard the technology did have to wait until now for Avatar. It was only a few years ago you could only see hour-long underwater films in IMAX 3-D. Maybe there was a reason for that. I don't have all the numbers. But I'm guessing Cameron's going to fuck with our spatial recognition longer than any director in human history.

Are you a parasitic space organisim that kills Newts? Then get away from The Boards, you bitch!

Last Updated on Saturday, 05 September 2009 13:01
 
Mike Judge Still Wants to Do You PDF  | Print |  E-mail
Written by Joe O'Shansky   
Saturday, 05 September 2009 08:58

alt

As follow up to the Extract trailer I posted months ago: Extract came out today.

Just kidding. That's not the follow up (though it did come out today so Fandango your asses to a theater). No, the real story popped up earlier this week in the form of a promo clip for Extract featuring director Mike Judge's two most famous creations, Beavis and Butthead. The 3 minute spot is just a clip from the movie bookended by B&B pimping the film while sporting Hefneresque wardrobes and making "Bateman" jokes. Still, it warms the cockles of my vagina. Click here and weep for your misspent youth.

Additionally, the Judge himself has been talking up the new film and, to varying degrees, revealing tidbits about other projects; past and future. First, and maybe foremost, Cinemablend has an exclusive interview wherein Judge talks about a sequel to Beavis and Butthead Do America. Short story: Not on the front burner. And, oddly, Judge calls himself out for something I noticed in the promo clip. His voice is changing. Butthead was sounding his usual self, but Beavis sounds like he might have pubes now. That might fit into the idea he has for a sequel though, as far as I can tell, so I don't get the trepidation.

Second, and perhaps more formostly, Frosty at Collider has an exclusive one-on-one with Judge that finally sheds some light on what the fuck happened with the release of Idiocracy. He calls the interview a Must Watch, and I agree. Click here to see a two-part window into the mind of a laid back Texan that makes laid back funny.

Do you still go "Uhhhhhn...heheh-hehehe--Hey, baby...", in your head when you see a hot chick? Lock yourself in the bathroom and claim you're taking a dump on The Boards!
 

Last Updated on Saturday, 05 September 2009 11:34
 
TROY: LEGACY PDF  | Print |  E-mail
Written by Joe O'Shansky   
Saturday, 05 September 2009 08:18

alt

I'm posting this trailer because I'm sure there are a couple of Boondock Saints fans among you. I'm just not among you. Troy Duffy's feature debut is one that was not wholly un-entertaining but certainly undeserving of its voracious cult following. A post-Tarantino is too cool-fest, that possess a tiny percentage of the bullet-riddled awesome Duffy thinks it has, Saints is most memorable to me for watching some good actors have fun. Willem Defoe and Billy Connolly, in particular. Like I said, it's not horrible. But now that voracious cult following is getting a sequel, and from the looks of the trailer, Duffy figured out a way to horrible. Click here for IGN's exclusive shitty trailer for Boondock Saints II: All Saints Day (or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Wonder What Asshole Named This Movie).

And after what I hope are 2-minutes of being deeply unimpressed, click here to see the trailer for Overnight, the documentary (and much better film) about the making of Boondock Saints, and the amazing flame out of it's director, Troy Duffy.

Are you a Boondock Saints fan? What would you do if I told you your pinko Commie mother sucked so much dick, her face looks like an egg on The Boards?!
 

Last Updated on Saturday, 05 September 2009 11:35
 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>

Page 1 of 22